<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The climate giant awakes. Have we turned a corner?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulgilding.com/cockatoo-chronicles/cc20091008climategiantawakes.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulgilding.com/cockatoo-chronicles/cc20091008climategiantawakes.html</link>
	<description>Personal website of Paul Gilding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:51:17 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The climate giant awakes. Have we turned a corner? : the dublin Hub</title>
		<link>http://paulgilding.com/cockatoo-chronicles/cc20091008climategiantawakes.html/comment-page-1#comment-3724</link>
		<dc:creator>The climate giant awakes. Have we turned a corner? : the dublin Hub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgilding.com/?p=201#comment-3724</guid>
		<description>[...] from the Cockatoo Chronicles, starting from discussions arising around the COP15 climate talks last December, Paul Gilding goes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from the Cockatoo Chronicles, starting from discussions arising around the COP15 climate talks last December, Paul Gilding goes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://paulgilding.com/cockatoo-chronicles/cc20091008climategiantawakes.html/comment-page-1#comment-1663</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgilding.com/?p=201#comment-1663</guid>
		<description>Ref. Sarah  thanks for the cherry picking overview.  

Interestingly,   there is further room for manouver to &quot;shake&quot; the data, by taking it from WHERE you want  e.g. primarily from within city precincts  but leave out the too hard to get to sites, like Siberia.     In addition the Kyoto measurement of emissions excludes the uptake of  GHGs (C02, Ch4, H20 and N20) by all old forests, and other vegetation (grass , bush, weeds, crops, some  aided by soil/ plant companion  micro organisms, fungus,  algae and bacteria, and earthworms etc.)  These elements are consequently sequestered in the timber/soil... and eventually recycled.    This system provides  Oxygen  to the atmosphere.

The whole emissions measurement scene is ridiculous... especially for us in the Southern Hemisphere!   

 4.4% of the  apparent C02 emissions comes from the southern hemisphere, which holds 7% of the land mass.    Thus 97% of these emissions comes from the Northern Hemisphere  containing 93% of the land!     New Zealand, Australia and South Africa are not  big emitters   

Reality:   The Northern hemisphere holds the most humans.   All the  issues surrounding global warming are driven  by us  humans motivated by greed for, or the maintenance of,   status, wealth, and power.  Globally, we humans cause  the  damage to the planet and we disrupt the natural cycles and systems.   

Many thanks Paul  :    We can learn from China, who  will likely  provide the most intelligent actions and outcomes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ref. Sarah  thanks for the cherry picking overview.  </p>
<p>Interestingly,   there is further room for manouver to &#8220;shake&#8221; the data, by taking it from WHERE you want  e.g. primarily from within city precincts  but leave out the too hard to get to sites, like Siberia.     In addition the Kyoto measurement of emissions excludes the uptake of  GHGs (C02, Ch4, H20 and N20) by all old forests, and other vegetation (grass , bush, weeds, crops, some  aided by soil/ plant companion  micro organisms, fungus,  algae and bacteria, and earthworms etc.)  These elements are consequently sequestered in the timber/soil&#8230; and eventually recycled.    This system provides  Oxygen  to the atmosphere.</p>
<p>The whole emissions measurement scene is ridiculous&#8230; especially for us in the Southern Hemisphere!   </p>
<p> 4.4% of the  apparent C02 emissions comes from the southern hemisphere, which holds 7% of the land mass.    Thus 97% of these emissions comes from the Northern Hemisphere  containing 93% of the land!     New Zealand, Australia and South Africa are not  big emitters   </p>
<p>Reality:   The Northern hemisphere holds the most humans.   All the  issues surrounding global warming are driven  by us  humans motivated by greed for, or the maintenance of,   status, wealth, and power.  Globally, we humans cause  the  damage to the planet and we disrupt the natural cycles and systems.   </p>
<p>Many thanks Paul  :    We can learn from China, who  will likely  provide the most intelligent actions and outcomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://paulgilding.com/cockatoo-chronicles/cc20091008climategiantawakes.html/comment-page-1#comment-1662</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgilding.com/?p=201#comment-1662</guid>
		<description>Ref. Sarah  thanks for the cherry picking overview.  

Interestingly,   there is further room for manouver to &quot;shake&quot; the data, by taking it from WHERE you want  e.g. primarily from within city precincts  but leave out the too hard to get to sites, like Siberia.     In addition the Kyoto measurement of emissions excludes the uptake of  GHGs (C02, Ch4, H20 and N20) by all old forests, and other vegetation (grass , bush, weeds, crops, some  aided by soil/ plant companion  micro organisms, fungus,  algae and bacteria, and earthworms etc.)  These elements are consequently sequestered in the timber/soil... and eventually recycled.    This system provides  Oxygen  to the atmosphere.

The whole emissions measurement scene is ridiculous... especially for us in the Southern Hemisphere!   

 4.4% of the  apparent C02 emissions comes from the southern hemisphere, which holds 7% of the land mass.    Thus 97% of these emissions comes from the Northern Hemisphere  containing 93% of the land!     New Zealand, Australia and South Africa are not  big emitters   

Reality:   The Norrthern hemisphere holds the most humans.   All the  issues surrounding global warming are driven  by us  humans motivated by greed for, or the maintenance of,   status, wealth, and power.  Globally, we humans cause  the  damage to the planet and we disrupt the natural cycles and systems.   

Many thanks Paul  :    We can learn from China, who  will likely  provide the most intelligent actions and outcomes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ref. Sarah  thanks for the cherry picking overview.  </p>
<p>Interestingly,   there is further room for manouver to &#8220;shake&#8221; the data, by taking it from WHERE you want  e.g. primarily from within city precincts  but leave out the too hard to get to sites, like Siberia.     In addition the Kyoto measurement of emissions excludes the uptake of  GHGs (C02, Ch4, H20 and N20) by all old forests, and other vegetation (grass , bush, weeds, crops, some  aided by soil/ plant companion  micro organisms, fungus,  algae and bacteria, and earthworms etc.)  These elements are consequently sequestered in the timber/soil&#8230; and eventually recycled.    This system provides  Oxygen  to the atmosphere.</p>
<p>The whole emissions measurement scene is ridiculous&#8230; especially for us in the Southern Hemisphere!   </p>
<p> 4.4% of the  apparent C02 emissions comes from the southern hemisphere, which holds 7% of the land mass.    Thus 97% of these emissions comes from the Northern Hemisphere  containing 93% of the land!     New Zealand, Australia and South Africa are not  big emitters   </p>
<p>Reality:   The Norrthern hemisphere holds the most humans.   All the  issues surrounding global warming are driven  by us  humans motivated by greed for, or the maintenance of,   status, wealth, and power.  Globally, we humans cause  the  damage to the planet and we disrupt the natural cycles and systems.   </p>
<p>Many thanks Paul  :    We can learn from China, who  will likely  provide the most intelligent actions and outcomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah-jane Potts</title>
		<link>http://paulgilding.com/cockatoo-chronicles/cc20091008climategiantawakes.html/comment-page-1#comment-1603</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah-jane Potts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgilding.com/?p=201#comment-1603</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul,
I like your article...my thoughts have been of a similar ilk over the past few weeks, that there has been a tangilbe shift in some places where it counts.
At the same time, the &#039;skeptics&#039; are still going hard and it seems that the general public is more confused than ever by skilful articles like this one:

http://www.climatechangefraud.com/behind-the-science/5323-a-cherry-pickers-guide-to-temperature-trends-down-flateven-up

I would really love to see someone like yourself directly address the persuasive arguements presented here...I find myself unable to, although I personally have no doubt that our current practices on all levels are having a devastating effect on the planetary life-support systems by whos grace we live.
Sarah-jane Potts
Sydney</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,<br />
I like your article&#8230;my thoughts have been of a similar ilk over the past few weeks, that there has been a tangilbe shift in some places where it counts.<br />
At the same time, the &#8217;skeptics&#8217; are still going hard and it seems that the general public is more confused than ever by skilful articles like this one:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.climatechangefraud.com/behind-the-science/5323-a-cherry-pickers-guide-to-temperature-trends-down-flateven-up" rel="nofollow">http://www.climatechangefraud.com/behind-the-science/5323-a-cherry-pickers-guide-to-temperature-trends-down-flateven-up</a></p>
<p>I would really love to see someone like yourself directly address the persuasive arguements presented here&#8230;I find myself unable to, although I personally have no doubt that our current practices on all levels are having a devastating effect on the planetary life-support systems by whos grace we live.<br />
Sarah-jane Potts<br />
Sydney</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://paulgilding.com/cockatoo-chronicles/cc20091008climategiantawakes.html/comment-page-1#comment-1553</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgilding.com/?p=201#comment-1553</guid>
		<description>Thanks Paul, I look forward to every piece you write. Just finished reading &quot;The Road&quot; by Cormac McCarthy a disturbing and intense fictional book detailing the end of human civilization to Global Warming. Although fictional, it does not lie too far from our foreseeable futures if we continue blindly on the path of &quot;progress&quot; and economic growth. The information you and your references provide is giving people hope and hence the will to keep up the flight.

Many thanks,
Danielle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Paul, I look forward to every piece you write. Just finished reading &#8220;The Road&#8221; by Cormac McCarthy a disturbing and intense fictional book detailing the end of human civilization to Global Warming. Although fictional, it does not lie too far from our foreseeable futures if we continue blindly on the path of &#8220;progress&#8221; and economic growth. The information you and your references provide is giving people hope and hence the will to keep up the flight.</p>
<p>Many thanks,<br />
Danielle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Gilding thinks there&#8217;s hope. Do you? &#171; Incite – Leading Sustainability</title>
		<link>http://paulgilding.com/cockatoo-chronicles/cc20091008climategiantawakes.html/comment-page-1#comment-1549</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Gilding thinks there&#8217;s hope. Do you? &#171; Incite – Leading Sustainability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgilding.com/?p=201#comment-1549</guid>
		<description>[...] a comment &#187;  In his most recent blog post, Australian sustainability notable Paul Gilding writes optimistically that: I think we have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a comment &raquo;  In his most recent blog post, Australian sustainability notable Paul Gilding writes optimistically that: I think we have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Osborn</title>
		<link>http://paulgilding.com/cockatoo-chronicles/cc20091008climategiantawakes.html/comment-page-1#comment-1548</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Osborn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgilding.com/?p=201#comment-1548</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul,

Thanks a second time for bringing the global campaigning side of policy into your assessment, and in particular our work at 350.org.  

From the start of 350.org, I&#039;ve always taken heart in Paul Hawken&#039;s thesis in Blessed Unrest of the unrecognized movement around environment and social justice.  Public engagement worldwide has more than enough power to shift this debate - the key is making that power seen and felt collectively as a social movement.  Because it&#039;s baseline science, and because it&#039;s a scientific data point and not a social value in itself, the 350 ppm target turns out to be a pretty effective movement symbol.  We can fill it with our own piece of the demand for a safe climate, and though there are surely disagreements on how we get there, making our power felt collectively requires some hook for the human imagination to link us all together.  

I&#039;m now confident we&#039;ll succeed in achieving that recognition on the 24th of October, with Liz Thornton above, and over 1,800 organizers in 141 countries (and growing).  The degree to which we&#039;ll succeed, we&#039;ll find out on the night of the 24th, and in the weeks to follow leading into Copenhagen.  But these kind of shared moments are what will make all of our work add up to more than the sum of its parts, and give civil society the focused strength to play its part in the global &#039;tip&#039;. 

Warm regards,
Jeremy Osborn
Berlin, Germany</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,</p>
<p>Thanks a second time for bringing the global campaigning side of policy into your assessment, and in particular our work at 350.org.  </p>
<p>From the start of 350.org, I&#8217;ve always taken heart in Paul Hawken&#8217;s thesis in Blessed Unrest of the unrecognized movement around environment and social justice.  Public engagement worldwide has more than enough power to shift this debate &#8211; the key is making that power seen and felt collectively as a social movement.  Because it&#8217;s baseline science, and because it&#8217;s a scientific data point and not a social value in itself, the 350 ppm target turns out to be a pretty effective movement symbol.  We can fill it with our own piece of the demand for a safe climate, and though there are surely disagreements on how we get there, making our power felt collectively requires some hook for the human imagination to link us all together.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m now confident we&#8217;ll succeed in achieving that recognition on the 24th of October, with Liz Thornton above, and over 1,800 organizers in 141 countries (and growing).  The degree to which we&#8217;ll succeed, we&#8217;ll find out on the night of the 24th, and in the weeks to follow leading into Copenhagen.  But these kind of shared moments are what will make all of our work add up to more than the sum of its parts, and give civil society the focused strength to play its part in the global &#8216;tip&#8217;. </p>
<p>Warm regards,<br />
Jeremy Osborn<br />
Berlin, Germany</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard Eddy</title>
		<link>http://paulgilding.com/cockatoo-chronicles/cc20091008climategiantawakes.html/comment-page-1#comment-1545</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Eddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 02:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgilding.com/?p=201#comment-1545</guid>
		<description>Dear Paul, 

I always look forward to your prescient commentary.

The worry is, we have yet to hear any positive noises out of Canberra. The world sees us at the cutting front of climate change and we appear to be dragging our feet waiting for market forces to boost the cost of carbon AFTER the ETS is activated in 2011. Hello

We lead the world in carbon emissions per capita 20.56 tonnes. The IPCC is saying this should be about 1 tonne for everyone on the planet. The connection is clear between climate change and worsening water problems. We lead the world down the wrong path on that too. (pending Productivity Commission Report)

Economic rationalists; water and energy corporations have hijacked sane policy and gagged debate.

The trick is to devise means to get this discussion into the headlines.  Any ideas?

Your readers are on the ball - now for the rest of the country!

regards,
Bernard Eddy
Australian Water Network</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Paul, </p>
<p>I always look forward to your prescient commentary.</p>
<p>The worry is, we have yet to hear any positive noises out of Canberra. The world sees us at the cutting front of climate change and we appear to be dragging our feet waiting for market forces to boost the cost of carbon AFTER the ETS is activated in 2011. Hello</p>
<p>We lead the world in carbon emissions per capita 20.56 tonnes. The IPCC is saying this should be about 1 tonne for everyone on the planet. The connection is clear between climate change and worsening water problems. We lead the world down the wrong path on that too. (pending Productivity Commission Report)</p>
<p>Economic rationalists; water and energy corporations have hijacked sane policy and gagged debate.</p>
<p>The trick is to devise means to get this discussion into the headlines.  Any ideas?</p>
<p>Your readers are on the ball &#8211; now for the rest of the country!</p>
<p>regards,<br />
Bernard Eddy<br />
Australian Water Network</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail</title>
		<link>http://paulgilding.com/cockatoo-chronicles/cc20091008climategiantawakes.html/comment-page-1#comment-1543</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgilding.com/?p=201#comment-1543</guid>
		<description>China&#039;s one-child policy was brutal but prescient.  I&#039;m not advocating dictatorship, but they do have a ruthless was of getting things done.  The so-called democracy of America is ineffectual and cannot deliver real change, so far.  I am still hopeful and giving Obama the benefit of the doubt, especially considering the multiple disasters he inherited upon taking office.

But the American public is dominated by Deniers and Ignorers.  Perhaps it will be that the USA is eclipsed, marginalized and impoverished as China rises and takes the lead in true clean energy progress.

Whatever.  I for one welcome our new Green Masters - or the Flying Spaghetti Monster, whichever I must submit to first!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China&#8217;s one-child policy was brutal but prescient.  I&#8217;m not advocating dictatorship, but they do have a ruthless was of getting things done.  The so-called democracy of America is ineffectual and cannot deliver real change, so far.  I am still hopeful and giving Obama the benefit of the doubt, especially considering the multiple disasters he inherited upon taking office.</p>
<p>But the American public is dominated by Deniers and Ignorers.  Perhaps it will be that the USA is eclipsed, marginalized and impoverished as China rises and takes the lead in true clean energy progress.</p>
<p>Whatever.  I for one welcome our new Green Masters &#8211; or the Flying Spaghetti Monster, whichever I must submit to first!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://paulgilding.com/cockatoo-chronicles/cc20091008climategiantawakes.html/comment-page-1#comment-1542</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgilding.com/?p=201#comment-1542</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul - great post as usual - thought provoking and well written.  One question: what commitments have the 500 companies from the Cambridge Program who signed the Copenhagen Communique made to actually reduce their greenhouse has emissions?  The world desparately needs action not words or commitments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul &#8211; great post as usual &#8211; thought provoking and well written.  One question: what commitments have the 500 companies from the Cambridge Program who signed the Copenhagen Communique made to actually reduce their greenhouse has emissions?  The world desparately needs action not words or commitments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
